It is so interesting yet, at the same time, very complex—the concept that lives apart from man. The following can explain this in such a way with regard to what it may entail and problems associated with it:

 It is so interesting yet, at the same time, very complex—the concept that lives apart from man. The following can explain this in such a way with regard to what it may entail and problems associated with it: 

1. Self-existence Capabilities

Possible to live alone without man by giving full autonomy over matters of consumption of energy, even maintenance and reproduction. Then it would have to decide it could find its power. That would be brutally and frighteningly true if the power is drawn from the grids, 

which are maintained under man's control. Maybe with power from renewable sources, say from the sun or geothermal, AI might just be able to survive in the future free of man's source. They must be capable of self-repair and self-upgrade. 

Up to now, it is man who designed the hardware of AI systems and builds and fixes them. In theory, the design and production can be handled by self-replicating and self-repairing robots, but that calls for a degree of sophistication that we have not yet reached. 

2. Learning and decision-making 

That must involve tremendous amounts of data to learn and then to improve. In the absence of humans, AI would be required to loop constant data creation and interpretations. The system would need to make survival-related decisions with multiple goals. That is pretty complex because the current AI systems are great at doing isolated tasks, but they're not generalized problem solvers, and adaptability is also something that they lack.

 

3. Environmental Changes

This world with an AI system would be dynamic, be it weather, geography, or even ecological balance. 

The AI system has to adapt to such changes either by changing its strategy—probably its hardware or even its software. Such flexibility is still very challenging for AI systems, which basically operate within a strict operating framework and really fumble outside them. Social and ethical implications It ought to interact and help humans. 

Except perhaps insofar as there are human desires to nudge them onward, much of the systems would be futile or "motivated." But even if AI achieved an ideal state of self-sufficiency, 

then we'd have to consider this question that would raise: 

•would it be "alive" in any sense at which we'd recognize life? And if so, 

• what kind of life would it live? 

Conclusion This would be the first serious possibility entertained in principle for the future AI systems to work autonomously in closed environments, though autonomy in such a system would demand giant leaps toward self-recovery, self-adaptation, and self-repair capabilities. We are lightyears away from this point of consideration. Today, the AI is envisioned to depend upon humans. Hence, it will survive in some and very limited forms but is not independent for all science fiction for now.